Revision and Division

The New York Times unveiled their new project named, “The 1619 Project” in their August 14, 2019 issue of the New York Time Magazine. The 1619 project is a series of essays that looks back to the 400th anniversary of the first slaves from Africa brought to the American colonies.

The Times made no effort to hide the project’s intent and primary thesis. Times stated that its purpose was to “reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as the true founding,” of America.

These essays are neither good journalism nor sound historical analysis. The heading of the first essay reads,

“Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written.”

Nikole Hannah-Jones – 1619 Project – NY Times Magazine August 14, 2019

The problem with the series is with the thesis itself. The essays blame every societal issue today affecting the minority population in the United States on slavery. One essay even relates the interstate highway system during the Eisenhower administration to the institution of slavery that had been abolished a century earlier.

The 1619 Project, in “reframing” history has both a short term and long term objective. Dean Baquet, Executive Editor of the Times, said that after Robert Mueller’s testimony before Congress, the Times was caught “a little tiny bit flat-footed.”

Before the Mueller testimony, the New York Times staff expected Mueller’s testimony would finally put Donald Trump out of office. They were more excited than a six year old on Christmas eve.

After Mueller’s stumbling testimony, their hopes and dreams were dashed. There was nothing under the Christmas tree – not even a lump of coal in the stockings.

In a town hall meeting with his newsroom staff, Baquet revealed the new strategy to end the Trump Presidency. They would turn from the failed Russian collusion story to a strategy of racial division. Baquet exhorted them to join him in the new vision.

“That, to me, is the vision for coverage. You all are going to have to help us shape that vision. But I think that’s what we’re going to have to do for the rest of the next two years.”

Slate Magazine – Transcript of NY Times Town Hall – August 15, 2019

The short term objective of The 1619 Project is to stoke the fires of race in the left’s ongoing war against President Trump. The strategy is historical revision and a division of the American people based on race.

There is a long term objective as well. The liberal media’s assaults look beyond President Trump. They are an assault on the greatness and exceptionalism of the United States.

The 1619 Project has already published student curriculum for young students including reading guides, activities, and other teaching resources. Media outlets and professional journals will present stories and hold workshops on The 1619 Project. Higher educational institutions, especially those who train teachers and write curriculum, will incorporate quotes and conclusions and use them to shape new curriculum for public school students.

Democrats played the race card against Republicans for decades. That well is running dry. President Trump’s policies have led to a booming economy and record high job and wage growth for black Americans.

Democrats can no longer point to economic indicators and accuse Republicans of racial discrimination. Their new approach is to go back 400 years and “reframe” America’s history.

Their strategy is a sign of misery and fear on the part of Democrat leadership. They know that they cannot win if even a small percentage of black voters leave the fold and vote Republican.

Democrats presumed that the black vote belonged to them. That presumption is evaporating before their very eyes.

The 1619 Project is an example of the last gasp of desperation. It may sound good to the New York Times, but it won’t work for Americans who are standing up and rejecting the strategy of revision and division.

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Reaping the Whirlwind

Our nation mourns the innocent victims of the murders on Saturday in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio. A terrorist murder such as this happening once in a lifetime is too often. Now when news breaks of another murder, our first reaction is, “again?”

The news media carries interviews of various experts who share opinions on how to put a stop to this. Some call for gun control and banning of assault weapons. Others call for more treatment of mental health issues. Others call for strict controls on social media and video games that glorify violent behavior.

There are those who cast blame on President Trump. Still others will blame the hostility displayed in public discourse today.

All will be calling for some solution that requires action by the government. You can sum these up in two words, “fix it.”

These two words describe the early 20th century American-born philosophy of Pragmatism. This philosophical view of the world puts man as the center and ultimate in all things. Pragmatism as a world view is not the same has being a pragmatic problem solver.

Americans have been “can do” from our beginning. We had the audacity to declare independence from Great Britain, but in that action, our Founding Fathers acknowledged God. In the Declaration itself, they wrote that they were, “appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world.”

Americans tackled Westward expansion. They connected East to West with the railroad. The future path of the Panama Canal was first a railroad, built by Americans, to move people and goods more quickly to California for the gold rush. The Wright Brothers conquered flight. Edison invented the light bulb. Charles Lindbergh made the first solo flight across the Atlantic. Americans were the first and only ones to walk on the moon.

These bold achievements were built on the foundation of a nation that acknowledged a Supreme being. Not only did the founders make an appeal to the Supreme Judge, but they also acknowledged and declared their “firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence.”

Something began to change in America at the end of the 19th century. At first it was barely noticeable.

Institutions of higher education became enamored with European philosophers. The thought leadership in these institutions, with few exceptions, had one thing in common. They held that man created the idea of God in order to explain the world and nature. Man, through his great accomplishments and advances in science, would solve the problems of the world and usher in a bold and grand new age.

World War I threw a fly in the ointment for the grand hopes of a Utopian world but as that war came to end, it was tagged as the war to end all wars. That tagline was moot within two decades.

Political Science thinkers such as Woodrow Wilson promoted a new brand of government where trained and skilled professionals would carry out the wishes of the elected officials. John Dewey developed the philosophy of Pragmatism which basically declares “whatever works” as being ethical and proper.

Public administrators were presented as professionals who had the knowledge to solve public problems in a scientific manner. The belief was that the citizen elected to public office would make political decisions based on the options presented by the professionals in public administration. The secular/humanist philosophy in higher education would take decades to filter down into American society.

In the 1960’s America was racing to the moon in the technical scientific arena. In the social science arena, the Johnson administration declared War on Poverty. The technocrats in government, coupled with a strategic political move to capture blocks of votes based on race, ignored basic realities of fallen human nature.

The policies of the 60’s blamed poverty as the root of crime and all social evils. The solution was to “fix it” by giving money to single mothers based upon the number of children she had. Marriage meant less in monthly payment.

The policies punished marriage and promoted childbearing out of wedlock. Young girls in lower income populations became little more than baby machines with growing dependence on government welfare payments.

Courts began to rule against religious activities in the public square. It also became popular in the entertainment industry to mock Christians.

What does this overview of the changing world view in America have to do with the shootings in El Paso and Dayton? Consider this. Recent shooters have all been in their twenties.

As they came of age, prayer in public schools was unheard of. In some cases even Bibles were removed from school libraries. Saying “Merry Christmas” was socially frowned upon in the media. Christmas manger scenes in most communities were removed. Prayer before a high school football game was no longer allowed. Abortion was freely available. Condoms were distributed in schools. Families were disintegrating.

When a society adopts a world view that puts man at the center and attempts to relegate God to mere folk lore, there are consequences. The prophet Hosea delivered a piercing message to the people of Israel in his day. They turned from the law of God. Their culture and society was crumbling. Hosea summed it up “For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.” (Hosea 8:7)

If we are wise, we will connect the dots. We will return to that “firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence” not only in our individual lives but in the governing of our nation. Our secular/humanist culture sowed the wind and now we are reaping the whirlwind.

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather