I’m With Blake – Kill the State Income Tax

The legislature is in session, and this session brings calls for killing taxes. The House is looking at killing the homestead property tax and the Senate is looking to kill the state income tax.

Florida killed the state income tax years ago and now is looking to eliminate property taxes. We should aspire to both eventually. This article focuses on the state income tax.

Senator Blake Tillery, Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee is leading the charge to kill the tax. He was appointed to Chair the Special Committee to Eliminate the Income Tax. The Committee released its report as the General Assembly convened.

Bottom Line

The report begins with a bold “literally boldfaced, headline sized print” summary statement:

“We recommend making the first $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for joint filers completely tax free beginning in 2027. We also recommend reducing the state income tax rate for all other families and businesses. These proposals completely eliminate the state income tax on 2/3 of all working Georgians while drastically reducing the tax burden on everyone else.”

As the Chairman, Blake Tillery wrote an editorial for the Atlanta Journal Constitution to support the bold plan. Underscoring the aggressive plan, Tillery wrote that the committee’s charge was not to debate whether or not eliminating the income tax was a good idea. The charge was “to figure out how to do it responsibility.”

Plenty of politicians make bold campaign promises about cutting taxes. Chairman Tillery and the committee did not want to just talk. Their proposal is like the old Nike shoe slogan, “Just do it.”

What this means is that on day one of the new tax year, 2/3 of Georgia families would see an immediate elimination of the state income tax. That means zero state income tax deductions from their take home pay. It also means that the business they work for has less compliance burden in withholding and sending taxes to the state Department of Revenue.

How We “Pay for It”

When I mention eliminating the state income tax to some of my friends, the first question out of their mouths is often, “how are you going to pay for it?” That question itself belies an understanding that taxes come from a source that belongs to the government rather than to the individual. (That’s an article for another day)

Some liberal think tanks put out horror talking points stating that the sales tax would have to be increased to 12% to make up the difference. The committee faced those kinds of misrepresentations in its second meeting.

The committee unanimously and on a bi-partisan basis approved a motion that, “any elimination of the income tax wouldn’t accompany new state taxes on groceries, property, or gas.”

So how could the state adjust to the loss of state income taxes that are eliminated for 2/3 of Georgians? We do it by continuing the bold, conservative, fiscal policies that have led to strong economic growth and record surpluses each year.

We also do it by eliminating special interest tax breaks. In his editorial Chairman Tillery noted that the complexities of income taxes are an invitation to carve-outs and special treatment for special interest groups. Who ultimately pays for these carve-outs? You do.

The committee report puts it this way, “when special interests pay less, everyone else pays more.” Eliminating the income tax for everyone focuses on the average Georgia family as the special interest that is really important.

Prioritize and Execute – Just Do It

The committee has done its work. For my policy wonk friends, you can read the full report here: Georgia Senate Special Committee on the Elimination of Georgia’s Income Tax Final Report and Recommendations

The committee has acted responsibly by holding four meetings across the state and receiving input from numerous sources. I am impressed that the 22 page report concludes with a one sentence recommendation,

“Pass legislation this year to eliminate Georgia’s personal income tax on the first $50,000 a year for single filers and $100,000 per year for married couples filing jointly, effective January 1, 2027.”

The recommendation is positvely blunt with action, timeliness, and impact:

“Pass legislation.”

“This year.”

“To eliminate.”

Time for talking is past. Now it is the time to act. Just do it.

Subscribe to Don Cole.Com

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Democrats Reject Shut-Down Compromises

Yesterday, Chuck Schumer and the Democrats rejected two compromise proposals from Republicans to open the government.

One was to guarantee a vote by a set date on an extension of Obamacare credits. This is what Democrats have been railing for.

Here was a deal offered up on a silver platter. Republicans would debate it and bring it up for a vote. There is no guarantee that what the Democrats want will pass, but there was a guarantee that they would get a vote.

Some Republicans, including the Georgia firebrand, Marjorie Taylor Greene, have expressed concerns about the anticipated rate increases in Obamacare when the credits expire at the end of the year. They may have her on their side. By the way, the expiration date for the credits was set by the Democrats when they adopted the credits during the Covid crisis.

The point here is that Democrats might get something out of the deal. There is no way to know until they open it up and debate it. But Schumer rejected the proposal.

Majority leader, John Thune, had a pointed response published by MSNBC. He reportedly said, “At some point, Democrats have to take ‘yes’ for an answer.”

A second compromise was to peel off appropriations for the War Department and pass that spending bill. This would assure that military and War Department personnel would get paid. Schumer rejected that offer as well.

There are no strings attached to the Republican bill. It simply authorizes the continued operation of the government at the current level through November 21. During this time, the House and the Senate would act on appropriation bills to fully fund the government through the end of the fiscal year on September 30, 2026.

Even though Republicans hold a slim majority in the Senate, they need 60 votes to end debate and vote on the simple, no-strings, continuing resolution that the House has already passed. They only have 55 votes right now with three of those votes being Democrats. They need five more Democrats to side with them but that is not happening.

Democrats say that Republicans are unwilling to discuss the many issues involved with the budget. Republicans are more than happy to debate and do what the Democrats say they do not want to do.

What they will not do is to hold up government operations and services to Americans while they debate. Republicans have a simple clean, continuing resolution on the table.

Republicans have compromised with two offers. Republicans want to open the government, keep providing the services to Americans and debate the points of contention with the Democrats.

Democrats reject both compromise offers. As Majority Leader Thune says, “At some point, Democrats have to take ‘yes’ for an answer.”

Subscribe to Don Cole.Com

Click Here to Sign up and receive my commentary in your e-mail box – no junk, no ads, just plain common-sense commentary.

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Freed Hostages Today – Free Enterprise Tomorrow

Thank you to President Trump on a Tel Aviv Beach
Image from Air Force One

One week ago I shared my thoughts on a deal to release the hostages and end the war in Gaza. One of the main actors in the deal was Hamas.

The reputation of Hamas is not one of reliability. President Trump, however, insisted that the deal was promising.

This morning, with respect to the remaining living hostages, the agreement came to fruition. President Trump flew to the region to put his signature on the agreement.

The last of the hostages were transferred from captivity to freedom at about the same time as Air Force One was touching down. It was almost as if Trump choreographed the scene.

Today is a day of rejoicing and thanking God for answered prayers. It is only the first step of a long journey in rebuilding, not only a war-torn region, but war-torn hearts.

I believe that President Trump has put the players on the right path. President Trump is looking at this next challenge through the eyes of a developer, not a diplomat.

He sees how Gaza and the entire region could be prosperous and peaceful and not just on paper. Peace and prosperity comes when the economic engine of freedom is cranked up and running full speed ahead.

Today is one of those days that you will remember. The hostages were freed today as a first step of peace. Hopefully we will see free enterprise at work to guide the journey tomorrow.

Subscribe to Don Cole.Com

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Fish or Cut Bait

We are now in day 3 of the Schumer Shutdown. The explanation is pretty simple.

The House passed a 24 page continuing resolution to keep things as they are and continue funding the government through November 21. The Senate received the resolution and put it on the floor for a vote.

Because of the filibuster rule in the Senate, there must be 60 votes to end debate. Democrat minority leader Schumer refused to call on Democrats to vote to keep the government open until November 21.

Instead, he introduced a bill that demanded:

  • Free health care for illegal aliens
  • $500 million in taxpayer funding to prop up liberal news outlets
  • A $50 billion cut in investments for improving rural health care
  • Billions in funding for DEI and climate projects in foreign countries

What a contrast between a simple 24-page resolution that kept the government open and the Democrat monstrosity. For years Democrats passed, with Republican support, continuing resolutions to give time to work out issues.

This time; however, Democrats demand that everyone rush to make radical changes. Republicans will not consider these changes.

For example, I looked at the Democrat bill. Page 57, Section 2141 is crystal clear – “Repeal of Health Subtitle Changes.” These were changes made in the Working Families Health Care Bill which, among others eliminated the Biden administration give-away of free health care for illegal aliens.

Democrats also wanted to do away with $50 billion investments made for rural health care. They wanted to add billions for DEI and projects related to climate.

Simply put, Republicans cut budget items that gave your tax dollars to illegal aliens and worthless projects in foreign countries. Democrats want to put those back.

So where does that leave us? Are we at an impasse where Republicans will have to fold in order to reopen the government?

It seems that was the way at always worked in the past. This time it is different.

Because there are no appropriations and the government is not funded, the President now has flexibility to make even more cuts without a congressional fight. I am amazed that Democrats are not willing to extend with a continuing resolution but are willing to hand the power to President Trump to cut programs.

President Trump has shown great patience as we enter into day three. He is meeting with Russ Vought of the Office of Management and Budget to look at programs that could be cut permanently or temporarily. Be assured. Cuts are coming.

In this case, Democrats think that they can win. They should realize that President Trump is not interested in cutting bait. He came to fish.

Subscribe to Don Cole.Com

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

When You Are in a Hole – Stop Digging

I recently wrote an article in which I was critical of Sanford Bishop’s Nay vote on a resolution regarding Charlie Kirk. That resolution condemned political violence, commended law enforcement and first responders, expressed condolences to the widow and family of Charlie Kirk, recommitted to respectful debate and recognized and honored the life of Charlie Kirk, the one who embodied the challenges expressed in the resolution.

Apparently calls from the people of his Southwest Georgia led Bishop to give his account for voting Nay. His explanation only makes things worse. His statement reads that the resolution:

“…..was an attempt to use this tragedy as an opportunity to lionize his beliefs. While he was entitled to have and express his beliefs freely, some of them are offensive to me and to the many people targeted by his invective and vitriol. They do not reflect the highest and noblest values of America, nor my Judeo-Christian faith, and I cannot condone them.” (CONGRESSMAN BISHOP’S STATEMENT ON HOUSE RESOLUTION 719 | Congressman Sanford Bishop)

I would like to know which beliefs of Charlie Kirk are offensive and what is the invective and vitriol that targets “many people.”

Was it Charlie’s example of following the teachings of Jesus Christ that led a grieving widow to choose to forgive the man who took her husband’s life?

Was it the challenge to young people to fall in love, get married, and have children?

Was it his invitation for all to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ?

Was it because Charlie Kirk freely shared and encouraged those with differing opinions to take the microphone and engage in a conversation to seek the truth?

Perhaps it was his pointing out the negative impact in society of fatherless families.

Perhaps it was his desire to see healing in broken families.

I believe that what Sanford Bishop found offensive were the Democrat talking points. I doubt that he ever took the time to listen to what Charlie Kirk actually had to say.

Mr. Bishop should be more specific about which beliefs were offensive. Did he find them offensive merely because he did not agree with them?

Would Mr. Bishop give examples of Charlie Kirk’s “invective and vitriol.” I’m not referring to talking points of the Democrats, but real examples.

I suspect when one disagrees with a liberal policy position, that becomes “invective and vitriol” in the mind of Mr. Bishop and the Democrats who voted against the resolution.

What we need here is some clarity on what Mr. Bishop means by “offensive” and “invective and vitriol.” As it is now, with his explanation, he has dug himself deeper into a hard left partisan hole.

Subscribe to Don Cole.Com

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Responding to Federal Firing

On Valentine’s Day, I started work early as I normally do. I was greeted with an e-mail sent late the previous evening with the glaring subject line, “Notice of Termination.”

The subject line was bad enough. The message included this line, “The Agency finds, based on your performance, that you have not demonstrated that your further employment at the Agency would be in the public interest.” The message went on to say that I was removed from my position as of close of business February 13.

I had a lot of different emotions hitting me from all sides. I had not been just laid off. I was not cut because of a reduction in force. I was fired for not “demonstrating” that my work was in the public interest. At least that’s what the message said.

Several thousand federal employees who had been on the job less than a year got the same message. The action of making the cuts was not personal, but it sure felt like it was.

At that moment, I had an important decision to make. How would I respond to this action? I had no control over the circumstances, but I did have control over what I did next.

Feelings of anger, resentment, and bitterness, shouted for me to grab hold and dance with them. I cannot honestly say that I did not entertain those feelings for a few moments. There was another voice that was not as loud but it was convincing.

That voice came from a message that I have drilled into my mind for nearly four decades. I have given away hundreds of jars of beans with a pecan. It is a four minute sermon as to how to face circumstances exactly like I was facing right then.

If you are facing similar circumstances now, take a moment to watch the video. After you have seen it, you probably know someone who could use a lift. It won’t change your circumstances, but it will change how you view them.

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

An Overlooked Line in Declaration Brought to Light

On this 4th of July, allow me to take a moment of personal privilege to congratulate my parents, Robert and Earline Cole on their 74th wedding anniversary. Both in their 10th decade of life still love each other till death do us part. Congratulations.

On its last day in session, the US Supreme Court handed down a ruling in the case of West Virginia v EPA that, without making specific mention, brought to light an overlooked line in the Declaration of Independence. One of the specific grievances against King George was a single sentence of just 23 words.

The grievance reads: “He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.”

It almost appears as if the founding fathers peered into the crystal ball to see the state of our nation two centuries down the road. We brought upon ourselves the thing we hated – the administrative state.

The administrative state is not mentioned in the Constitution. Although it resides in the Executive branch, it is not one of the branches of government. While the Constitution makes no mention of it, the administrative state has grown to enact more rules having the force of law and issues even more guidance documents. A guidance document may not have the force of law but for all practical purposes it carries the weight of law through implication and sometimes intimidation.

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote a concurring opinion which pointed to the rapid growth of the federal government. In one of his footnotes, Gorsuch noted that between 1970 and 1990 the Code of Federal Regulations grew from 44,000 pages to 106,000. While Congress passes 200 to 400 laws each year, the administrative agencies issue 3,000 to 5,000 final rules. (Footnote 2 in Gorsuch concurring opinion page 7)

Quoting from the Federalist papers, Gorsuch wrote, “the framers believed that a republic— a thing of the people—would be more likely to enact just laws than a regime administered by a ruling class of largely unaccountable “ministers.”

So, as you celebrate another year of America’s Declaration of Independence, keep in mind that it takes more than a mighty military to maintain our freedom. Like erosion slowly moves the earth underneath one grain at a time, our freedom is in danger of being taken over one regulation at a time by “a multitude of New Offices” and “swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.”

Have a great Independence Day and resolve to stay free.

Subscribe to Don Cole.Com

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Wayne Johnson Will Sue to Stop Joe Biden from Cancelling Student Loan Debt

Early voting starts today. If you are in the 2nd District, I support, and ask you to vote for Wayne Johnson for Congress in the Republican primary. Here is just one reason why.

Joe Biden came out last week with his plan to cancel student loans. Wayne Johnson fired back with a promise to do more than just talk about how bad the plan was.

“I will sue Joe Biden.” Five action packed words summed up Johnson’s practical problem solving approach.

Tucker Carlson said that Wayne Johnson is the most knowledgeable man in America on the issue of student loans. He served in the Trump administration running the student loan program and saw the multitude of problems with the student loan program and recommended that the entire program be killed.

I wrote about Wayne’s common sense approach to solve the problem in an article last January. (“When You’ve Dug a Hole, Stop Digging”) What Joe Biden is proposing is not a solution.

Read Wayne’s press release below and you will see why I support Wayne Johnson. He is willing to tackle serious issues for our nation and the 2nd District. Wayne does not just talk the talk. He walks the walk.

PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 28, 2022
CONTACT: Dan McLagan
media@johnsoncongress.com

Trump Education Official Wayne Johnson Declares
“I Will Sue Joe Biden” To Stop Student Loan Debt Cancellation

“Taxpayers should not be forced to make an in-kind contribution to the Joe Biden or Sanford Bishop re-election campaigns”

Columbus, GA. – Former senior Trump Administration DOE official, and Republican Congressional candidate, Dr. Wayne Johnson said he will file a lawsuit against the Biden Administration if it moves to unlawfully cancel student loan debt by way of executive action, as the administration signaled it is intending to do.

“The White House, the Department of Justice and the Department of Education all know that any unilateral or broad form of student loan debt cancellation requires full congressional approval,” stated Johnson.

Johnson said Biden and Secretary Cardona are bending to the wishes of Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders with the belief that if they push the “idiotic” forward, no one will object in the courts.

“I will bring a Federal lawsuit if this is done,” said Johnson. “I will seek an immediate injunction and make a promise to the American taxpayers that I will do all I can to stop this overreach by Biden.”

Tucker Carlson interviewed Johnson in 2020 and said Johnson knows more about the federal student loan program than anyone in the country.

“Our nation’s student loan situation is a sad, sad mess,” said Johnson. “In fact, it’s a financial abomination affecting millions of families. To do something like what Biden and just about every Democrat is wanting to do — just giving away taxpayer money, without any plan to stop this problem going forward — is political pandering at its worst and a prime example of why we need to ‘Stop the Stupid’ in Washington.”

Johnson, who oversaw the $1.7 trillion student loan program during the Trump Administration as the Chief Operating Officer for the Office of Federal Student Aid, has previously called for eliminating the entire Federal Student Loan Program. His proposals have recommended “defined dollar limit” federal grants and having banks and other lenders, including schools themselves, offer student loans and otherwise provide for the financing of higher education for students.

“Canceling student loan debt while leaving the program itself unchanged is a recipe for continuously repeating this crisis,” Johnson explained. “That is the definition of insanity and will continue to send future generations into debt. It also creates the ongoing moral hazard of people expecting that if debt is cancelled once, it will be canceled again in the future; so why not borrow to the max, believing full well it will never have to be paid back.”

“Taxpayers who pay their debts, work hard and live within their means should not be handed a bill for a purely political act by a president who is floundering in the polls,” Johnson said. “Taxpayers should not be forced to make an in-kind financial contribution to Joe Biden’s re-election campaign or that of Sanford Bishop and other liberal members of Congress who are running scared from the debacle that is our current situation in Washington.”

“There is a way that we as a nation can solve this problem of runaway, out of control student loan debt and absurd college cost. However, it will require Republicans in Congress to take the “Bull by the horns” to change law and bring fiscal sanity into play. I am the Republican who has the knowledge and experience to lead this”, according to Dr. Johnson.

Johnson is a rock-solid conservative candidate in the Republican Primary in the 2nd Congressional District covering Middle and Southwest Georgia. Johnson served as a Senior Official within the Trump Administration, was an officer in the U.S. Army and is an Eagle Scout.

Johnson obtained his undergraduate and doctoral degrees from Mercer University and his MBA from Emory University. He was born, raised and currently resides in Macon.

www.JohnsonCongress.com

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

When You’ve Dug Yourself in a Hole – Stop Digging

In this commentary, I will address the Federal Student Loan program. For full disclosure purposes, I am paid as Campaign Manager for Wayne Johnson for Congress. The opinions I share on DonCole.com are mine and I am not being paid to write this article.

Student loans were in the news when the Covid suspension of payments was about to end this month. President Biden kicked the can down the road until May, thus postponing another political disaster within his administration when millions would have to begin making payments again.FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Sickening Surrender

Sometime on Monday afternoon, I began to experience a sickening feeling. The last American aircraft was flying out of Kabul.

Hundreds of Americans were still stuck in Afghanistan having been refused entry to the airport. Most will hopefully be allowed to leave the country after September 1 when it is clear that the Taliban, not the United States, gave them permission to leave.

It is likely that some will be detained, perhaps even incarcerated for alleged espionage or other crimes against the ruling authorities. The State Department and President will perform the official wringing of hands and say that it is unacceptable.

That line of “unacceptable” has always made me laugh. How can it be unacceptable if we are accepting it by doing nothing? FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather