Execution by Paper Cut

Democrats are trying to execute Brett Kavanaugh by paper cut. They have been very clear about their goal to stop his confirmation. They intentionally hid an allegation of sexual assault for weeks. The sole reason was to throw it out as a last minute Hail Mary pass to delay the Senate Judiciary Committee vote.

Witnesses named by the accuser have denied knowing anything about the alleged event. Judge Kavanaugh immediately issued a strong denial and asked to testify before the Judiciary Committee.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Grassley made extraordinary accommodations for the accuser to offer testimony to the committee. The first hint came on September 13, after the committee had completed hearings. A vote was scheduled for the following week, September 20.

It was then that Senator Fienstein revealed that she had turned over a letter to investigators from an anonymous source about an anonymous matter. Unnamed sources stated that it was an allegation of sexual misconduct by Judge Kavanaugh.

Over the weekend, the accuser was identified as Christine Blasey Ford. She said that she wanted to testify. The scheduled vote for Thursday the 20th was cancelled and a hearing was set for Monday the 24th.

With each new day, new excuses and demands arose from Ford’s attorney. Then another accusation came out from Deborah Ramirez. Democrats immediately called for more delays and more conditions. The hearing was rescheduled to Thursday the 27th for Ford and Kavanaugh both to testify.

Meanwhile, not wanting to be left out, Stormy Daniels’ lawyer Michael Avenatti, popped out of the clown car and announced that he also has someone ready to come forward in the next 48 hours.

Fortunately, Senator Grassley has put his foot down. Thursday, September 27 is the date for the hearing. I still doubt that Ford will show up for the hearing.

Grassley has scheduled a vote for Friday. Senate Republicans are poised to start the full Senate confirmation vote debate on Saturday. Until the Senate finally has a confirmation vote, we may as well get accustomed to hearing outrageous claims from all corners.

Democrats hoped that Kavanaugh would give up and quit. Thankfully, he is not quitting. He is standing firm while Democrats are trying to execute by paper cut.

Signature-Donald E. Cole

I appreciate you taking the time to read my thoughts. Please forward these to your friends and share on Facebook.

Sign up to below to get my commentaries sent directly to your in-box.

I promise, you won’t get a bunch of junk and I will not share your e-mail address with anyone. When you get an e-mail from me, you can be assured that it will be easy to read, informative, and usually short. Thank you again for reading.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required







FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Democrat Houses of Cards Are About to Collapse

Monday, September 17, 2018 will be recorded as a bad day for Democrats. They have built houses of cards that are about to collapse.

First, the accusation of Brett Kavanaugh. It began to break before the weekend from Senator Dianne Feinstein of a serious report of an anonymous incident by a person who wished to remain anonymous.

Senator Feinstein had the information since July but never said anything about it until the hearings were over. That alone proves her disingenuous intent.

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Kavanaugh Won’t Be Borked

In 1987, Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell announced his retirement from the Supreme Court. Powell was considered to be a moderate swing vote in close decisions.

President Ronald Reagan nominated Robert Bork who was serving in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Judge Bork was considered eminently qualified.

He held to the judicial philosophy of originalism which is that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the text of the Constitution and what it meant to a reasonable person at the time it was adopted.

The Constitution itself provided an avenue for making changes through a legislative process. His view stood in stark contrast to a judicial activist philosophy that sees the Constitution as a living document whose meaning changes with time.

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Randolph Did right

Southwest Georgia’s Randolph County board of elections did the right thing to abandon the plan to close voting precincts. The county hit the national news when the Elections Board considered a plan to close 7 of 9 voting precincts and consolidate them into two. The proposed plan was a local decision made by a local election board based on a recommendation from a consultant.

When Secretary of State Brian Kemp, the Republican nominee for Governor, heard about the plan, he was the first elected official to speak out against it: “we strongly urged local officials to abandon this effort and focus on preparing for a secure, accessible, and fair election for voters this November.” State Representative Gerald Greene, a Republican, also opposed the plan. But it was Democrat nominee Stacey Abrams and the Georgia Democrat party who saw the opportunity to make it a racial issue and blamed Republicans for attempted voter suppression.

Democrats seized on the news and shrewdly spun it as a sinister plan of Republicans to suppress the black vote. Randolph County’s population is 61% black and it is one of the poorest counties in the nation.

Chart of Precincts in Randolph County, GA

Precincts Won By Donald Trump in Red

In politics, perception is reality and the spin, based on misrepresentation, achieved the goal of attracting media attention and promoting a message that Republicans are the enemy of black Georgians. The truth is that President Trump won 5 of the 7 precincts that were on the list to be closed and nearly half his votes came from those precincts.

The Randolph County Elections Board has two members, one black female and one white male. The consultant’s recommendation was based on locations not being compliant with the Americans for Disabilities Act. It would have also presumably saved the county money by having two polling places rather than nine.

County Attorney, Tommy Coleman, who at one time was the Executive Director of the Georgia Democratic Party, told a reporter from the Washington Post, “I’m quite sure the Board of Elections didn’t intend to disenfranchise any voters. . . . This morphed into something that wasn’t their intention.”

The consultant apparently looked at voting as if it were a merely a mechanical process that could be done more “efficiently.” The recommendation to close 7 precincts and consolidate into one was not based on racial considerations. In a way, it was even more insidious. It was based on a philosophy that views public administration as a science that only professionals can understand. It is a philosophy that creates one-size-fits-all templates while losing sight of the importance of individuals and communities.

Following an outcry from the entire community, the Elections Board met a second time and quickly reversed their decision. They also terminated the consultant who recommended the plan. They did the right thing.

A process to hold and manage fair elections is a basic function of American government. In rural areas the small precinct represents a community. The best government is the government that is closest to the people. These small precinct voting places in fire stations, community centers, churches, schools, and similar gathering places are not just a place to gather votes. They are places where the freedom to vote is an open display of our great nation making the basic decisions on how we the people will govern ourselves.

The volunteer fire station where a small number of people come to vote makes a powerful statement. The elderly farmer, retired school teacher, young married couple, and single mom with a toddler walking by her side, go to the polling place. There they see other people that they know. They know the polling worker who has worked that same polling place for years. They cast their votes for everything from county commissioner to President of the United States. They take that action right there in their own community.

The money spent to provide polling places closer to the people is well spent and should be a priority in the local government budgets. Some voting precincts will be in more densely populated areas and therefore have more voters. Some will be in sparsely populated areas and have fewer voters.

Voting places in communities serve a vital role. They stand as a living witness at every election of the liberty and freedom we have as Americans. In a very real way, those tiny precincts in rural areas remind us that we are a nation of the people, for the people, and by the people. Randolph County did the right thing. I hope that other counties who might be considering similar actions will pause and ask the people before they make such a move. I also hope that counties which may have already taken such measures, will go back and reconsider reopening the smaller precincts in the less populated parts of the county.

In the Randolph County case, Republicans and Democrats wholeheartedly agreed. It was the right thing to do.

Signature-Donald E. Cole

I appreciate you taking the time to read my thoughts. Please forward these to your friends and share on Facebook.

Sign up to below to get my commentaries sent directly to your in-box.

I promise, you won’t get a bunch of junk and I will not share your e-mail address with anyone. When you get an e-mail from me, you can be assured that it will be easy to read, informative, and usually short. Thank you again for reading.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 






FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Mr. Bishop Fund that Wall

An open letter to Congressman Sanford Bishop, Democrat – 2nd District of Georgia

Dear Congressman Bishop,

We heard the tragic news of the murder of Mollie Tibbetts yesterday. As a nation, we have watched the news and prayed since her disappearance over a month ago. Hope had grown dim and then our greatest fears were confirmed when police announced that they found her body.

As if to stab another wound, we learned that the murderer was an illegal alien. The man who murdered Mollie Tibbetts did not murder her because he was an illegal alien. But he was in the place to murder her because he was an illegal alien. If our borders were secure, he would not have been in Iowa and Mollie Tibbetts would have finished her jog with no incident.

I was sickened to hear Democrat Senator Warren say that she was so sorry for the Tibbetts family, but “One of the things we have to remember is we need an immigration system that is effective, that focuses on where real problems are.” She went on to talk about the separation of children from their parents at the border and concluded, “Separating a mama from a baby does not make this country safer.” Mollie Tibbetts was her mama’s baby who is separated with no reunification in this lifetime.

President Trump has been the only President who has seriously addressed border security. Your Democrat party has stood against him at every turn. It has been long past time for you to change your position. I ask you to stand up for President Trump.

The people of the 2nd district are proud, patriotic, Americans. We welcome legal migration to our nation. We want to see an immigration system that is faster, friendlier, and easier for those who seek the American Dream. We want them to come, live, grow a family, and become a part of the great melting pot of America. Those who seek liberty, who seek opportunity, who seek to make a better life for themselves and their communities are welcome. Those who stand in honor and respect when the American Flag passes by are embraced and accepted as our American brothers and sisters.

We do not welcome illegal immigration. We want it stopped. President Trump is doing his best to stop illegal immigration and yet you and the Democrats actively work against every move.

Many Democrats called to abolish the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Members of the US House of Representatives responded to these insulting calls by introducting a resolution expressing support and thanks for the work of ICE. You voted, “PRESENT.”

You refused to express appreciation and support for our law enforcement officers charged with protecting our borders. I wonder when you have last been in Southwest Georgia. In every community there are signs posted that read, “Back the Blue.” Have you not seen them? There are more of them than there are of your campaign signs.

How dare you refuse to support ICE? If you cannot support them, then at least be honest and vote NO on the resolution. But you did neither.

“PRESENT” tells me that you are more interested in what your Washington friends think than you are in what your constituents think. It also tells me that you are afraid to take a position. That is why you are in congress. It looks to me like you are only interested in holding your position in Washington rather than taking a position to represent your district.

You have an opportunity to change that perception. Take a close look at this picture of Mollie Tibbetts. Realize that this could have just as easily been a student from Columbus State University, Albany State University, Southwestern State University, Fort Valley State University, Middle Georgia State College or Bainbridge State College.

One of the bills coming before you in the next few weeks will include budget to support President Trump to build a wall and tighten border security. Do not merely vote “Present.” Do not make excuses. Do not offer Washington doublespeak. As your constituent, I have one simple request when it comes before you. Mr. Bishop, fund that wall!

Signature-Donald E. Cole

I appreciate you taking the time to read my thoughts. Please forward these to your friends and share on Facebook.

Sign up to below to get my commentaries sent directly to your in-box.

I promise, you won’t get a bunch of junk and I will not share your e-mail address with anyone. When you get an e-mail from me, you can be assured that it will be easy to read, informative, and usually short. Thank you again for reading.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required








 

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Brennan Doth Protest too Much, Methinks

Last week, President Trump revoked the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan. Based on the reaction of Brennan and the media, one would think that Trump had erected a guillotine on the White House lawn.

Brennan served as CIA Director in the Obama administration and has been a constant critic of President Trump. Last July, Brennan tweeted that the President’s press conference in Helsinki, “rises to and exceeds the threshold of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors.’ It was nothing short of treasonous. Not only were Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin.”

Brennan regularly appears as a paid guest analyst on network and cable news shows. He speaks with the authority of someone who has access to insider information that others in news organizations do not have.

Brennan reacted to revocation with defiance and righteous indignation. He called the revocation abnormal, dangerous, suppressing freedom of speech, and punishing critics. He compared the President to foreign tyrants and despots.

Others reacted in a similar fashion. John Kerry referred to the revocation as “banana republic behavior.” Congressman Adam Schiff went as far as to say that the President’s decision was unlawful.

These loud protests are based on the faulty premise that the revocation is the suppression of their freedom of speech. Mr. Brennan and his fellow supporters need to consider the irony of saying that the President is suppressing their free speech.

They are all freely communicating their positions on the matter through numerous means of social media, television, radio, newspapers, magazines, open letters, statements from the halls of congress, and any other means that they choose. Those media outlets are widely dispersing those opinions. I don’t see any censorship, redacting, or other suppression of anyone’s right to free speech.

The obvious question to ask is why these people should continue to have access to our nation’s secrets when they are no longer in an official government role. Why are they so indignant and outraged over losing access to information that is frankly no longer their business?

They do not have a need to know and one wonders why they would even want to know. If they are needed for ongoing consultation, that should be addressed on a case by case basis.

The real problem here is that everything got turned upside down. Somewhere along the line, the security clearance became a lifetime entitlement tied to the individual rather than tied to the actual mission and need to know.

A security clearance is not an entitlement. The President does not have to give a reason for revoking the clearance of someone who no longer holds a government position and therefore has no need to know. It is the other way around.

If there is a need for a former employee to maintain a clearance, then it is up to the current administration to determine if there is justification to maintain the clearance for the mission need. If the mission does not require a need to know, then the clearance becomes inactive the day the individual leaves the government role that required the clearance in the first place.

This is common sense that the average American understands. When you leave a job, you turn in your keys and your access cards, your e-mail account is inactivated, and you are removed from any other access that you had.

You can’t log on to check the company bank account just to see how it is doing. If you come back to the office for some reason, you get a visitor badge and, in some cases, may even need an escort to go to certain areas.

Only in Washington can there be such a firestorm over what should be a routine action. To paraphrase Shakespeare’s Hamlet, “Mr. Brennan doth protest too much, methinks.”

Signature-Donald E. Cole

I appreciate you taking the time to read my thoughts. Please forward these to your friends and share on Facebook.

Sign up to below to get my commentaries sent directly to your in-box.

I promise, you won’t get a bunch of junk and I will not share your e-mail address with anyone. When you get an e-mail from me, you can be assured that it will be easy to read, informative, and usually short. Thank you again for reading.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 






FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Your Vote Counts

Your vote counts. It is so easy on election day to get busy or have something unexpected come up and, at the end of the day, you realize that you forgot to vote. Then you rationalize and tell yourself that it doesn’t really make any difference anyway.

Two candidates for Board of Education, District 3, Lanier County, Georgia will quickly tell you differently. In the Republican Primary held on May 22, three candidates ran for School Board, District 3. Phillip Connell fell just 9 votes short of winning without a runoff.

I do not live in Lanier County but I do know Phillip Connell. If I lived there Phillip would have received my vote.

In the July 24 runoff, when all the votes were cast, the result was a tie – 170 votes each. So they go another round on August 21, but there is yet another cliff hanger.

One of the candidates, JJ Strickland, is an attorney. He has filed a lawsuit “demanding” an injunction to stop the 2nd run-off and give one of his supporters an opportunity to cast a second vote in the runoff. Here is what happened.

On election day, Tyler Westlake, went to vote. He received a ballot for School Board District 4. Tyler Westlake lives in District 3. When he looked at his the ballot, the candidates for District 3 were not on the ballot.

I know you are thinking that the problem should be easily resolved. He simply had to call an election official and point out that he did not see the candidates from his district.

The election official could void the erroneous ballot and give a correct ballot, or at least a provisional ballot, until they can straighten out the matter of which ballot the voter should receive. Election officials will tell you that these questions come up in every election.

The voting machine itself has a large notice on the screen before the ballot is cast. After making all selections and before casting the ballot, there is a final large screen to make a final review before casting the vote. At the very top of the screen, in large letters is this notice:

Photo of Voting Machine with Notice

“Carefully read all instructions before proceeding. If you have any questions, DO NOT touch anything: contact a poll worker.”

Step 3 of the instructions clearly states, “Your vote is FINAL when Cast Ballot is touched.”

Westlake proceeded to cast his vote. It was only after he voted that he told the election official of the mistake.

Instead of contacting a poll worker, as soon as he saw that District 3 candidates were not on the ballot, Mr. Westlake ignored all the instructions and went ahead and voted. After he cast his ballot, he told the poll worker that received the wrong ballot.

Even with paper ballot voting, the rule is always clear: After you drop your ballot in the ballot box, the vote is final. It is too late to change your mind. It is too late to ask questions. All questions, concerns, doubts, are to be resolved before pushing the button on a voting machine, or releasing the ballot to fall into the ballot box.

Until that moment, a voter can change as often as he or she wants. But once the ballot is cast, it is cast and that vote is final.

Mr. Strickland’s lawsuit is a desperate Hail Mary pass. I suspect that there are more than a few voters in Lanier Board of Education District 3 who view this as grasping for some technicality instead of honestly doing the work to ask every voter for his or her vote.

Common sense and bold faced instructions are clear, “DO NOT touch anything: contact a poll worker.” One cannot change the rules after the game has been played. This sounds more like Democrats in 2000 and hanging chads or Hillary blaming the Russians than it does a Republican Primary in South Georgia.

From a political point, this stunt is an extremely unwise move. I predict that it will hurt Strickland in the 2nd runoff.

Lanier County is a small close-knit community. It is one thing for a person to choose to not vote in an election. Tell that same person that a candidate is asking a judge to take away his or her right to vote and “thems fightin words.”

Lawsuits like this are why lawyers are not held in high esteem in the first place. This “demand” to take the election away from the people and have a judge give Strickland’s supporter a second vote is ludicrous. This kind of thing only adds to the greasy reputation of the legal profession.

There will be a hearing on August 16 to make a determination. Strickland has already said that if the judge rules against him, he intends to file an appeal. Yet, another unwise move on his part. In the mean time, early voting has started and the election is still on for August 21.

I suspect that more than a few voters who voted for Strickland in the primary and first runoff, will not be voting for him in this one. There are probably a few who did not vote in either of the previous elections but will go vote in this one just to vote against Strickland. Voters do not like politicians who who try to find a technical loophole that robs them of their right to vote.

This November, you will have your opportunity to vote. Go vote. Your vote counts.

Signature-Donald E. Cole

I appreciate you taking the time to read my thoughts. Please forward these to your friends and share on Facebook.

Sign up to below to get my commentaries sent directly to your in-box.

I promise, you won’t get a bunch of junk and I will not share your e-mail address with anyone. When you get an e-mail from me, you can be assured that it will be easy to read, informative, and usually short. Thank you again for reading.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 






FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Waking Up the American Dream

The American Dream has awakened from its slumber. Last Friday the US Bureau of Economic Analysis relased it’s quarterly report on Gross Domestic Product. The US economy grew at a quarterly rate of 4.1 percent in the period of April through June of 2018. The United States is on track to hit economic growth that it hasn’t seen in over a decade.

Much of the credit for this growth goes to President Trump. His aggressive cuts in the stranglehold of federal regulations along with the tax cuts passed by Congress just before last Christmas were the wakeup calls for the American dream.

Money held by American companies with overseas operations was not coming back to the United States because of the high tax penalties associated with bringing the money back. Now that money is starting to come back. It is being invested here in America and it is creating jobs.

Unemployment has plumeted to 3.8 percent. This is the lowest unemployment percentage in 18 years. African-American unemployment is at historic low levels.

This is significant because, even though the Democrat party does not want to believe it, there were a lot of African-Americans who voted for Trump because of the hope of jobs in the private sector. Eight years of Barack Obama and nearly half a century of Democrat class warfare have proven to be empty rhetoric.

Trump asked, “What do you have to lose?” Many took his offer. Now they see real results. The so called “spokesmen” who continue to spew class warfare and play the race card represent a continually shrinking percentage of the African-American voters who buy in to the blame game.

For the first time ever, job openings exceed the number of people seeking work. Small business optimism is up. Manufacturing optimism is up. Over 95 percent of manufacturers in a quartery outlook survey said that they have a positive outloook.

How did this radical shift take place? President Trump took an aggressive, common sense, approach to freeing the private sector and especially the average American. For too long, Washington operated in a vacum that was filled by lobbyists and politicians who swallowed the lure of money and prestige.

A thirst for position and influence may have started as a desire to better serve the people back home. Over time; however, the focus shifted from the people who elected them to the people they met with, dined with, and listened to every day inside the beltway. 

Money is the addictive drug of influence peddlers in DC. President Trump does not need it and will not take it.

He also broke the mold by refusing to cower before the Democrats in Congress. He proved that they were more bark than bite. I am cautiously optimistic that Republicans in Congress will finally do the same.

The American dream has been awakened from its slumber. Now the American people must stay alert and keep the dream growing. We cannot afford to hit the snooze button.

Signature-Donald E. Cole

I appreciate you taking the time to read my thoughts. Please forward these to your friends and share on Facebook.

Sign up to below to get my commentaries sent directly to your in-box.

I promise, you won’t get a bunch of junk and I will not share your e-mail address with anyone. When you get an e-mail from me, you can be assured that it will be easy to read, informative, and usually short. Thank you again for reading.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 






 

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

I Voted – Here’s How

I am often asked for my opinion on various races. When those I respect and trust tell me that they support a particular candidate, it helps me make my decision as well.

Party primaries and run-off elections can get so competitive that in the final days, the strategy appears to be mutual assured destruction. The heated rhetoric can get so strong that friendships are strained.

The Republican Governor’s primary is at the boiling point. I do not intend to turn up the heat. People for whom I have the greatest respect have endorsed both Republicans. The fact is that in a couple of weeks, one of the two in each race will be our nominee. I fully intend to support all our nominees.

Right now we have a responsibility to select which candidates will be our nominees. I voted on the first day of early voting. Here is how I voted.

For Secretary of State, I voted for Brad Raffensperger in the run-off. My original choice was Josh McKoon but Josh did not make it to the runoff. Brad was my second choice. He owns a small business so he knows about government regulations and how they impact small business. He is endorsed by Georgia Right to Life, has an A rating from the NRA, and from the National Federation of Independent Business. Brad got my vote.

For Lt. Governor, I voted for David Schafer. I have known David a long time. He was a conservative workhorse in the Georgia Senate. He has literally hundreds of endorsements from conservative leaders and organizations including Georgia Right to Life, NRA, Citizens for Trump, and many others.

In my experience, David has always done what he said that he would do. He is not a show horse and willing to work behind the scenes to get the job done. David got my vote.

For Governor, I voted for Brian Kemp. I know both Brian and Lt. Governor Cagle. I consider them both to be friends. In a few weeks, one will be our Republican nominee for Governor.

Brian Kemp is also a small business owner who has not let his public service role as Secretary of State go to his head. He is just as level headed and approachable as he was when he first ran for office. What drove him to run for office was the frustration of government.

He brought some common sense solutions to the office of Secretary of State and cut the budget while taking on additional services. It was Brian Kemp about two years ago who caught someone trying to hack into the Secretary of State database, and that “someone” turned out to be our own US Homeland Security. Kemp correctly ordered them to back off.

Kemp took on the Obama administration and won. Instead of giving Georgians lame excuses of why he could not take them on, he fought back.

There have been some very ugly attack ads that do not focus on Brian’s successes. Anyone who steps out to start a small business is taking a risk. It should not be a surprise that every business does not do as well as others.

All of us have challenges in life and those challenges tend to make us wiser and more humble. I personally know the pain of a project that went sour on me and had a terribly negative impact on my business, family, and personal credit rating.

I know many people who faced the same thing. It is not a bad reflection on their personal character. In many ways it is an asset because they, myself included, can empathize with those in the midst of struggles.

I believe that Brian connects with the average Georgian. He has not forgotten where he came from and why he got into government in the first place. Brian got my vote.

So there you have it. Brian Kemp for Governor, David Shafer for Lt. Governor, Brad Raffensperger for Secretary of State. That’s how I voted and I endorse each one.

Signature-Donald E. Cole

I appreciate you taking the time to read my thoughts. Please forward these to your friends and share on Facebook.

Sign up to below to get my commentaries sent directly to your in-box.

I promise, you won’t get a bunch of junk and I will not share your e-mail address with anyone. When you get an e-mail from me, you can be assured that it will be easy to read, informative, and usually short. Thank you again for reading.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 






FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

A Special 4th of July

I wish to take a point of personal privilege in this article. On July 4, our nation celebrates the anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

There is another important anniversary in my life that is celebrated on July 4. On July 4, 1948, Robert Cole and Mary Earline Ross stood before witnesses and made a vow to each other to enter into Holy Matrimony.

Husband and Wife Kissing

The vows went something like this:

“I, Robert, take thee Earline, to be my wedded wife, to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better – for worse, for richer – for poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and to cherish, till death do us part.”

My mother repeated the same vow to my father. The minister then declared that the two were husband and wife.

The event was so important that they obtained a license from the local courthouse and filed the document. They were a legal entitity with certain rights, privileges, and responsibilities to each other and to their community.

The most basic of social institutions, a family, came into existence with a simple declaration. Their income tax status changed. She took his name. They combined their belongings and moved in together.

A few years later, Robert took a job at Robins Air Force Base and purchased land in Bonaire. Robert, Earline, and their new baby boy moved to Bonaire and lived in a tiny trailer while Robert built a house for his family. Three years after their first child, they had a daughter.

They not only built a house, they built a home. They invested their lives in their community and their family. They still live in the same house that my father built.

Just last month Robert celebrated his 92nd birthday. It won’t be long before my mother turns 90.

They do not have the disposable income that they once had. They are not as healthy as they were when they said their vows to each other.

When they said to each other, “from this day forward.. for better for worse, for richer for poorer, in sickness and in health” they meant it.

They still love and cherish each other. Death has not yet parted the two and death will be the only thing that parts them.

On July 4, I wish Robert and Mary Earline Ross Cole a happy 70th anniversary.

Signature-Donald E. Cole

I appreciate you taking the time to read my thoughts. Please forward these to your friends and share on Facebook.

Sign up to below to get my commentaries sent directly to your in-box.

I promise, you won’t get a bunch of junk and I will not share your e-mail address with anyone. When you get an e-mail from me, you can be assured that it will be easy to read, informative, and usually short. Thank you again for reading.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required








 

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather